Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are one of the most exciting innovations in the blockchain space. DAOs allow communities to come together and collectively govern an organization in a decentralized way, without centralized leadership. However, DAOs come with their own set of challenges, especially around community disagreements that can lead to forking. In this article, we'll explore the risks of forking DAOs and provide tips for managing community disagreements constructively.
What is a DAO Fork?
A fork in a DAO happens when there is a major disagreement within the community that cannot be resolved. As a result, the original DAO splits into two separate entities, each with different visions moving forward.
Forking allows the community to go in two different directions. The original DAO retains its name and assets, while the dissenting group copies the codebase to create an entirely new DAO with different rules or priorities.
Why Do DAO Forks Happen?
There are a few key reasons DAOs may experience irreconciliable differences leading to forking:
As DAOs mature, members may develop strong but divergent ideas about the DAO's purpose and principles. For example, some members may want the DAO to prioritize decentralization above all else, while others believe adaptability and efficiency are more important. These ideological differences can be difficult to overcome.
Major changes to the DAO's underlying protocol may be contentious. While some members may support substantial revisions, others prefer sticking closer to the original code and vision.
DAOs rely on community governance, but conflicts can arise around voting rights, processes, or results. Disagreements about governance issues can build resentment and ultimately cause a fork.
Response to Crisis
Crises like hacks, exploits, or crashes often require a decisive response. If the community cannot agree on a plan forward, a fork allows each faction to implement their own solution separately.
The Risks of Forking a DAO
While forking allows dissatisfied members to enact their vision for the future, it also comes with substantial risks, including:
Splintering the Community
Forking often leads to animosity between the factions, fracturing the community and destroying social capital that took time to build. Much knowledge and history can be lost.
Diluting Network Effects
A unified community has more network effects. Forking splits activity across two entities, diluting the momentum and resources behind each.
Social Coordination Challenges
Coordinating and governing a DAO requires high social trust and cohesion. Forking damages this, creating more governance gridlock on both sides.
The new fork essentially clones the original DAO's work. Effort spent building identical or competing solutions is often wasted.
Asset values and staking rewards are also split across the forked DAOs, diluting the value proposition for holders and users.
Tips for Managing Community Disagreements
While forking is sometimes necessary as a last resort, DAOs should first seek to resolve disputes internally to avoid splintering the community. Here are some tips:
Foster a Collaborative Culture
Make respectful dialogue a core value from the outset. Provide forums for open discussion of issues and dissenting ideas.
Develop Sound Governance Processes
Institute inclusive, transparent voting mechanisms that give minority voices a chance to be heard. Seek consensus where possible.
Compromise on Non-Essentials
Distinguish fundamental principles from governance mechanics. Be prepared to compromise on implementation details.
Reward members and subgroups for collaborating and resolving disputes constructively without dividing the community.
Make Forking Difficult
Institute quorum requirements, vesting periods, or waiting periods to discourage spur-of-the-moment forking over real disagreements.
Bring in Objective Mediators
Appoint respected community members or outside experts to facilitate compromise discussions and defuse tensions.
How Can DAOs Recover from Forking?
Despite best efforts, some disagreements may still culminate in community splits. If a fork does occur, there are ways the DAOs can begin healing and progressing constructively:
Allow Time for Emotions to Cool
A "cooling off period" can help members move past animosity and resume a cooperative mindset.
Identify Shared Interests
Look for common goals, values, or needs across the divides. Emphasize a shared desire for the broader ecosystem to succeed.
Develop mechanisms that reward collaboration, compromise, and knowledge sharing between forked entities.
Foster Open Communication
Maintain open channels of communication between developers, users, and governance participants across forks.
The Road Ahead for DAOs
The decentralized community is still early in developing best practices around participatory governance at scale. As DAOs evolve, we can hope new norms and processes emerge organically that allow communities to manage conflict constructively. But forking will remain an critical safety valve when irreconcilable differences arise. Through experimentation and openness to new models of governance, DAOs can mature into stable organizations that maximize autonomy while minimizing painful community splits.
The innovation of DAOs presents huge opportunities - and risks - for collaborative governance and value creation. By studying when and why conflicts occur, we can better prepare decentralized communities to navigate the road ahead.
Check our guide of the most promising crypto